What's Faster on Hilly Terrain: Road Bike vs Tri Bike vs E-Bike

What's Faster on Hilly Terrain: Road Bike vs Tri Bike vs E-Bike

We tested a Cervelo S5, Cervelo P5, and Orbea Gain e-Bike to see which was faster on a hilly course.

 

Objective:

Compare relative speed of a road bike, triathon bike, and road e-bike on a hilly course. Complete a lap on each bike while regulating power to keep the effort consistent.

I segmented the loop into 3 parts:

Segment #1 is the relatively flat stretch starting from Bogus Basin Road and Hill Road and heading North on Hill.

 

Segment #2 is the long steady climb and descent that begins at the base of the climb at Seaman’s Gulch, descends past the entrance to Hidden Springs, and continues to the right hand turn onto Dry Creek Road.

 

Segment #3 is the longest segment of punchy climbs that takes you behind Hidden Springs and eventually descends back to the Bogus Basin Road and Hill Road.

 

The Course:

The “Dump Loop” is a 17.5 mile continuous loop in the North End of Boise with 1,450 ft of climbing. It’s a popular loop with a variety of long and steady climbs as well as short and punchy hills .

I segmented the loop into 3 parts:

Segment #1 is the relatively flat stretch starting from Bogus Basin Road and Hill Road and heading North on Hill.

 

Segment #2 is the long steady climb and descent that begins at the base of the climb at Seaman’s Gulch, descends past the entrance to Hidden Springs, and continues to the right hand turn onto Dry Creek Road.

 

Segment #3 is the longest segment of punchy climbs that takes you behind Hidden Springs and eventually descends back to the Bogus Basin Road and Hill Road.

 

The Equipment:

- 2019 Cervelo S5 Disc Ultegra aero road bike: 58cm. 19.5lbs fully loaded.

- 2019 Cervelo P5 Disc Ultegra Di2 triathlon bike: 58cm. 21.5lbs fully loaded.

- 2020 Orbea Gain Disc 105 e-Bike: ‘Lrg’. 28.5lbs fully loaded. 250w motor set to full power. 20mph motor cut-off speed.

 

A SRAM Quarq power meter was used on each bike to regulate the effort. The same front wheel was used on all three bikes. The Cervelos used the same rear wheel. The Orbea is a rear hub-driven e-bike, requiring that specific wheel to be used on the bike at all times. All tires were inflated to 80psi. One water bottle cage and bottle was used on each bike.

 

Power Regulation and Testing Method:

I tried to keep my effort to 200w on the flats, 240w on modest climbs, and up to 280w on the steepest climbs. The ride was completed over the course of ~3.5 hrs on a calm day, with approximately 20 minutes needed between laps to switch bikes at our shop (located about .5miles from the start of each loop).

 

Body Position:

The Cervelo S5 and Orbea positions were set to be identical to each other. I rode in the same position the entire time: in the classic and standard road position with my hands on the brake hoods.

On the Cervelo P5 I stayed in the aerobars so long as my speed was above 13mph. On the steeper descents, turns, and climbs I would come out of the aerobars, but go back into the aero position as soon as I safely could.

 

Hypothesis:

I believe the tri bike will be the fastest for the Dump Loop, taking 58min to an hour at this power output. Next the e-bike, and finally the road bike. I believe the e-bike will lose time to the tri bike on the flats, and make up some of that time on the climbs, but overall it will not be enough to make up for the time loss of time on flat terrain.

 

Lap #1: Cervelo S5 Disc Aero Road Bike

Lap Time: 1hr 2min 52sec

Lap Avg Power: 233w

Lap Avg HR: 122bpm

Segment #1: 15min 05sec. 204 w/avg.

Segment #2: 16min 09sec. 245 w/avg.

Segment #3: 31min 38sec. 238 w/avg.

Lap #2: Cervelo P5 Disc Triathlon Bike

Lap Time: 1hr 0 min 15sec

Lap Avg Power: 230w

Lap Avg HR: 124bpm

Segment #1: 13min 05sec. 197 w/avg.

Segment #2: 15min 47sec. 237 w/avg.

Segment #3: 31min 23sec. 237 w/avg.

Lap #3: Orbea Gain Disc e-Bike

Lap Time: 51min 59sec

Lap Avg Power: 223w

Lap Avg HR: 121bpm

Segment #1: 14min 05sec. 199 w/avg.

Segment #2: 11min 34sec. 233 w/avg.

Segment #3: 26min 20sec. 230 w/avg.

 

Conclusions:

 

S5 (road) vs P5 (tri): I was not surprised to see the P5 outsplit the competition on Segment 1. The slight elevation loss of this segment and relatively flat nature is ideal triathlon bike terrain. I was surprised to see the P5 outsplit the S5 on Segment 2, especially considering I averaged 8w lower on the P5. At first I believed this was due to the long descent after the 2.25 mile up Seaman's Gulch, but surprisingly the P5 was actually faster than the S5 by a few seconds on the climb, and made up another 15 seconds on the descent. The added weight of the P5 (2lbs) during the climb is not enough to negate the bike's aero benefit on both the climb and the descent (there is still air drag while climbing). This is a good reminder that a triathlon bike is rarely a penalty on a hilly course.

 

On the final segment I was happy to see that I averaged nearly identical power, and the bikes had nearly identical splits for this long segment (the P5 was still faster by 15 seconds). In Segment 3, the climbs are steeper, and the descents have more turns: the steeper climbs are more of a detriment for added weight, and the turns meant I could not decend in the P5’s aero bars as much as I could on Segment 1. Overall this part of the test confirmed in my mind that on a hilly course a triathlon bike can be faster than even the best road bikes.

 

As an interesting aside: the 2019 70.3 World Championship (WC) triathlon course was notoriously challenging with approximately 3800ft of climbing over 56miles. For reference these 3 Dump Loops have approximately 4350ft of climbing over 53 miles. Many athletes were unsure whether to use a triathlon or road bike for the 70.3 WC course, and I suspect the triathlon bike would still have been a slight advantage if setup to be as light as possible and if you corner well on it. I say this acknowledging that Gustav Iden won the race on a road bike with aerobars, and if there was ever a triathlon course where a road bike with aerobars would not be a disadvantage this was it.

 

Orbea Gain vs the Cervelos: This was my first time riding an e-bike any longer than around the block, and I’ll confess I had a huge smile on my face during my entire ride. When accelerating and climbing I felt like the Hand of God was pushing me along. The battery is cleanly hidden within the frame, and the motor is so silent I did not hear it when riding. It was truly an enjoyable experience to ride this bike- and not because I was going so much faster, but because the bike helped me ride faster without being obvious about it. The bike is simply elegant and a pleasure to ride- which is something I never ever thought I’d say about an e-bike.

 

My hypothesis of losing time on the flats but gaining on the climbs was generally correct- but I grossly underestimated how much faster I would climb with the help of that 250w motor. In hindsight, I should have guessed... 250w is a lot of extra power- a number similar to what many professional cyclists average in a race.

 

I am convinced a Class 1 e-Bike like the Orbea Gain can be a wonderful bike for someone who is looking for an understated e-Bike to help keep up on a group ride, ride with a friend or spouse, or simply cover more distance on their next ride. It could also function as a wonderful commuter- I almost wish I had a longer commute to justify investing in one.

 

Further Testing:

- I’ll test the P5 and S5 again, but this time test the S5 in a ‘race optimized’ position: meaning I’ll utilize the drops the entire lap and descend in the lowest position I can safely maintain. I believe this will reduce the time difference between the two bikes, but I believe the P5 will still be marginally faster.

- I’ll test the P5 with the objective to clock a 52min split for the loop (the same split as the e-Bike). I believe it will require an average of about 280w.

 

 

Comments

  1. Antonio Gonzalez Antonio Gonzalez

    Hello Kris,
    The Cervelo bikes are geared w/ a 53/39 crank and 11-28t cassette. The Orbea had a 52/36 crank and 11-28t cassette. My cadence averaged 84rpm on the S5, 80rpm on the P5, and 80rpm on the Orbea.

  2. Jason Rose Jason Rose

    This was a great read. When I did CDA70.3 I was thinking between road bike and TT bike due to the climbs. I stuck with road bike. I did find that I climbed much better than those on the TT bikes, but the flats and downhills those on TT bikes surpassed me. If I did it again, I would use my TT bike as like you did, I should be faster.

Leave a comment
* Your email address will not be published
* Required fields